

- #GOOGLE DOC REDACTED TEXT REDDIT PDF#
- #GOOGLE DOC REDACTED TEXT REDDIT GENERATOR#
- #GOOGLE DOC REDACTED TEXT REDDIT MOD#
#GOOGLE DOC REDACTED TEXT REDDIT GENERATOR#
(Or rather caste-rated.)īut when we later developed The Sims Online based on the original The Sims 1 code, its use of pseudo random numbers initially caused the parallel simulations that were running in lockstep on the client and headless server to diverge (causing terribly subtle hard-to-track-down bugs), because the headless server wasn't rendering the randomized pixelization effect but the client was, so we had to fix the client to use a separate user interface pseudo random number generator that didn't have any effect on the simulation's deterministic pseudo random number generator. The pixelized naughty bits censorship effect was more intended to cover up the humiliating fact that The Sims were not anatomically correct, for the benefit of The Sims own feelings and modesty, by implying that they were "fully functional" and had something to hide, not to prevent actual players from being shocked and offended and having heart attacks by being exposed to racy obscene visuals, because their actual junk that was censored was quite G-rated. That helped make it less obvious that it wasn't actually censoring penises, boobs, vaginas, and assholes, because the Sims were actually more like smooth Barbie dolls or GI-Joes with no actual naughty bits to censor, and the players knowing that would have embarrassed the poor Sims. When I implemented the pixelation censorship effect in The Sims 1, I actually injected some random noise every frame, so it made the pixels shimmer, even when time was paused. >Information also included measures used by the US Navy to protect its nuclear submarines, the Daily Star Sunday reported.

#GOOGLE DOC REDACTED TEXT REDDIT MOD#
>The MoD said a secure version had now been published and it was working to stop such an incident happening again. >Details were reported to include expert opinion on how well the fleet could cope with a catastrophic accident. >A technical error meant blacked-out parts of an online MoD report could be read by pasting into another document. >The Ministry of Defence has admitted that secret information about the UK's nuclear powered submarines was made available on the internet by mistake. >Internet mistake reveals UK nuclear submarine secrets From the UK, a similar incident happened back in 2011 with the Ministry of Defence.
#GOOGLE DOC REDACTED TEXT REDDIT PDF#
>Although parts of the public version of this filing appeared to be redacted by black bars at first glance, it quickly became apparent that anyone with Adobe Acrobat, or other PDF viewing tool, or even browser-based viewing tools, could easily copy and paste the text that still existed under the redaction blocks to another document to simply reveal the passages that had been redacted.

On pages five, six, seven and nine either the lawyers or the special council staffers attempted to redact sensitive passages. Back in 2019, lawyers representing Paul Manafort (a former lobbyist, political consultant, and lawyer, who chaired the Trump Presidential campaign team) filed a response to special counsel Robert Mueller’s claims that he violated his cooperation agreement by repeatedly lying to prosecutors. >With Paul Manafort being released from Jail on May 13th, for those in the document space like Alfresco, it was worth revisiting the PDF redaction issue that surfaced during his trial. >Redacting PDFs – What did the Manafort Lawyers get wrong? I remember seeing old iPads usually showing awful fringes as subpixel rendering was enabled without considering the actual orientation of the display. HiDPI displays (also mobile, not just 4K) get no real benefit from this and usually have a more complex subpixel layout anyway. Wrong assumptions about the pixel layout will show up very badly, as shown in. Using color fringing at non-pixel-aligned edges of characters can effectively triple the perceived horizontal resolution. A "typical" computer screen's pixels are split into three columns of red, green and blue, instead of lighting up as a solid square. This is a brilliant technique called subpixel rendering. > I’m actually not 100% sure why this happens (and sometimes doesn’t), but it’s an artifact of the rasterization process when text is rendered to screen. What gives? Shouldn’t it just be black and white since the text is black?
